Find a Lawyer

DR. FAROOQ SATTAR versus THE STATE

The National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Appreciating the evidence of Sections 9 (a) (vi) and 14 (d) is the fact that the accused, who was accused of trial in the Accountability Court, was subjected to Section 9 (a). Had not committed a crime in connection with the crime. (vi) and (vii) the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999, unless the fundamental facts based on the misuse of authority considered under section 9 (a) (vi) of the said ordinance are established, to prove the accused. Cannot be said for In this case, section 14 (d) of the Ordinance Charge means the first part of Section 9 (a) (vi) of the Ordinance relating to the misuse of authority in contracting and permitting the acquittal of his innocent firm. Was limited. Acting on goods imported from Port Qasim Source that had no alleged contractual relationship, the seed contract was given to the firm by a co-accused, the corporation's administrator, and the accused did not include the words of Port Bin. In the deal, Qasim was not specifically ordered to be the accused, and his co-accused had no benefit in contracting the firm, which in fact earned the corporation's benefit. Another way for a corporation's contractor to recover octroi from corporation boundaries or by road access to the port of Qasim through the corporation's boundaries is to recover. The party made a good offer, which was even confirmed by the Sindh government. The agreement was also declared lawful and lawful by the Supreme Court and a part of the Sindh High Court's decision. online advocate from Musakhel lawyer