Find a Lawyer

WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus MESSRS SEA GOLD TRADERS

Sections 12 (2) and 0 III, R1 Rules and Plaintiffs' Settlement Relationships were not given to the lawyer in the jurisdiction of the plaintiff, such fact was not brought to the notice of the court. That it is not authorized and the case was decided on the basis of a compromise under Section 12 (2), CPC dismissed by the defendant on the basis of misrepresentation and deception on the basis of fraud. Had filed. In the instant case, the defendants' right to their settlement was compromised by their ability to compromise or to relinquish any claim when the lawyer, in the circumstances, entered into the settlement, on behalf of the lawyer. Such action was deemed equitable. Misrepresentation is a synonymous term of fraud not only on the court but also on the defendant signing the compromise request, the lawyer exceeded the authority granted him and misled the court in passing section 12 (2) decree. However, the CPC was attracted to the matter immediately and the decree passed on the basis of the agreement was set aside. famous lower court advocate from Feroz Watan lawyer