MIR ZAMAN versus QURB.AN HUSSAIN
Articles 4, 8 (2) and 21 pre-discrimination rights of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, prohibited the use of the right before the notification of practice of persons belonging to the area of Islamabad due to the construction of the capital. Yes, Wendy was banished from Islamabad and has a certificate. While the administration issued a pre-emption suit against the shopkeepers, the respect was legally issued, the notification government suit issued by the trial court, while the appellate court allowed the appeal and on this basis It dismissed the claim that the notification was an applicable decision in the case and the order passed by the appellate court had been submitted by the High Court in advance that the suit under the notification was not available to the seller on the date of sale of the land. ? , Notification of the accuracy of the date of the institution of the case and the date on which the order was issued, with effect from the present date, therefore, on the termination of the pre-emptive right of the published emperor, in the pending case. The right to file or to sue was irrevocable regardless of whether the sale was made before the 14th authorization, and as a result, was liable to dismiss the case, where No decree was approved, it was applied before a certified dismissal in Islamabad, which resulted in the denial of a corporate judge and The order was passed to the Court of IT. The appeals court upheld the appeal by the Supreme Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Pannu aqil lawyer