Find a Lawyer

UMAR HAYAT versus MUHAMMAD ASGHAR

Although the question of apologists / shopkeepers was accepted before the plaintiffs / ex-emperors before the waiver of Articles 6 and 14 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right to Purchase Act, 1993, it did prove that the plaintiff Lost their right through exemption The suit was present at the time of the sale of the witnesses The question of waiver was not relied upon, even by the courts, the presence of the defendants at the time of suit land bargaining does not preclude them from exercising their rights. Before there should be any positive explicit action, such as actively participating in land bargaining negotiations to show that they have lost their prerogative rights by their conduct. power of attorney advocate Shorkot lawyer