WAHID BUX versus STATE
Control of the Narcotic Substance Act 1997 Section 9 (b) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Definition of Proof The trial of the accused under two different laws (Enforcement Head) Order, 1979 And the uncertainty of the prosecution regarding the Control of the Narcotic Substance Act, 1997, and the commission of the crime thereby, had thwarted the entire trial, which had the benefit of going to the accused, any free person. Chase, who was not involved in the rehabilitation process, recovered the chemical excavator from the delay of nine days was not explained by the prosecution. The property of the property prosecution case was not presented to the court nor was the accused shown at the time of filing his statement under section 342; the PC accused was acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Kotli Loharan lawyer