FAZAL MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
Referring to matters referred to in Articles 3, 5 and 23 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the decision to be binding on the referee was the result of an agreement between the parties that had the freedom to cancel it before it could be processed. The referee's statement was not clear, but was ambiguous, so the court can take further action in the matter rather than adjudicate the dispute between the parties, remand for the decision according to the law based on the referee's statement. Was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer
