Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NAIM AHMED KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH


Sections 68 (2) to 97 (2) of the Sindh Children Act 1955 (XIV of 1860), section 302/353/324/34 detention of a child Demon who was accused of a criminal offense as a child. , His case was sent to him a valid order to pass under section 68 (2) of the Provincial Government of Sindh Act, 1955, but despite the passage of four-and-a-half months, no order was passed and the deteno was passed. Jail was kept in the Central Jail. Be detained in jail and detained under section 68 (2) of the Sindh Children Act, 1955, only an unlawful, unlawful deprivation of a citizen's liberty under section 5 (97 (2)) of the said Act. The order can be granted. In cases where Dento's custody has been ordered to be handed over to Datano's father, it cannot be made permanent.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Haroonabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.