TARIQ MEHMOOD versus STATE
The complainant, who was the real brother of the victim, was located two miles away from the site of the incident and suspected that the complainant's statement was not substantiated by any other piece of evidence. It was The victim's wife, the star witness, and the house prisoner, were natural witnesses and did not support the prosecution's version, no other eyewitness testimony was available in the case, the complainant's statement regarding the recovery of the weapon of crime. Can't believe it. After his presence was revealed, the rifle's recovery did not affect the suspect's report; the firearm's positive report had no legal action, otherwise, the recovery of the weapon and the crime was empty, Proof, but no conclusive evidence of the suspect's involvement, especially when the goods were defamed by the eyewitness account
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Shikarpur lawyer