MUJAHID HUSSAIN NAQVI versus DIRECTOR/DEPUTY DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION
Section 42 (12) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act 1974, the rules of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court, 1978, O. XIII, R1 and O XXIII, RR 1 and 2 for leave to appeal the appeal for postponement of the petition. The application for leave was filed within thirty days of the criminal proceedings under R2 of the OXX XXIII of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules, 1978, after the expiry of 56 days. Was banned, the applicant insisted on the delay claim. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court Rules 1978 OO. The impression of this good impression, submitted by the general study of RR 1 and 2 of XIII and XIII of the Independent Judgment II, was that the limitation of filing applications for appeals in criminal cases such as civil. The cases were sixty days as the dispute was overturned as the deadline for filing appeals in Criminal Affairs and Civil Affairs Rules Order XXIII of Azad Jammu and Kashmir was fixed. 1978 was related to leave to appeal in criminal proceedings, which explicitly provided a time limit of thirty days, while the aforementioned principles regarding civil defense action allowed appeal in civil proceedings under a six-day ban. And these clauses of the law were very clear and the applicant, who was himself one of the senior lawyers of the Court, cannot be expected to be confused by the clear provisions of the law. Even the ignorant of the law was never considered a viable basis for delayed sentencing, either in civil or military In this case, the petitioner submitted the arguments
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
