Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ILLYAS MUHAMMAD versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT, BAHAWALPUR


Pakistan Penal Code Section 392/458/411/353/324/109 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Article 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution is charged with, no doubt, police alleged Was fired, but no police personnel nor anyone else was injured in the incident. The contents of the FIR have been accused of using force only against the law enforcement agency, which did not receive any endorsement because the accused had no recovered from the incident-related act, counter-terrorism. It did not fall within the purview of section 6 of the 1997 Act and the courts constituted under the said Act had no jurisdiction to hear the matter, so the impugned order passed by the special court in which the accused was made public The jurisdiction was directed to obtain relief from the court. , Law was approved in accordance with the law and accordingly no interference request was denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Goular Khel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.