MUHAMMAD MUNIR versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Non-payment of superannuation effect within the period prescribed for pre-emption of sections 21 and 25 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913, the trial court decided the suit land value and fixed sale price specified by the plaintiff, but the appellate court This decision amended the fixing price of the sale. The appellate court ordered the advance umpire / decree holder to be positively submitted within one month from the date of the appellate court's decision, which failed, according to which the international court dismissed, the appellant ordered the appellate court Did not deposit within one month of compliance. And after the expiry of a month, a revision was filed against the decision. The Impression Failure failed to collect the amount of support within the time set by the Appellate Court, otherwise the amendment was unable to be maintained, failing to comply with the Appellate Court's order. Was rejected. The court will collect the money within a period of one month's decision and the order passed by the appellate In review by the High Court, no legal weakness or illegally affecting court can be interfered with
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer