Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL MAJEED versus STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Sections 342, 364 (2) and 537 evidence were brought to the notice of the accused whether the allegations were made in Sections 302 (a), (b) or (c). And it is alleged that the accused has the right to be notified of the charges. , The statement of the accused under section 342, the accused's signature was not present in the CCP and it was not written in the presiding officer's handwriting, which was a violation of section 6464 (()), CC The PCs had mandatory provisions and were illegal under section 373737, against the CRPC charge being defective against the accused, the trial court was directed to proceed with the trial from the stage of making the charges. It should also be noted that in accordance with the law after giving full opportunity of hearing to the accused and to the parties under E-section 643 ((2)), the CCPC's mandatory provisions. Deciding the case of Buq.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Phagwar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.