Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALTAF versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/307/34 definition of evidence was a one-day incident, and the parties knew each other. All the accused were named as the special role of injury to the accused and the injured witnesses. Witnesses were injured. The witnesses could not be suspected of their presence on the spot, and they have confirmed the specific injuries caused by each of the accused. Medical evidence was completely verified by the ocular account, and upon the recovery of the crime weapon all the accused were immediately named in the listed FIR and no one was found to be the cause of their false implication or substitution. That the prosecution had established its case against the accused without any suspicion, there was no basis for interference in the convictions and convictions filed under section 302/34, PPC and section 307/34. In the absence of a trial of one of the PPC accused, his conviction and his conviction were set aside and his case remanded for remand to a competent jurisdictional court. Was directed at which the case could be terminated within a fixed time. ask a advocate free from Chak Jamal lawyer