Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SIDDIK versus THE STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 304 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 342 Definition of Evidence Examining the accused of natural justice, recovery of evidence of influence against the accused exists, but there is no question It was The trial court presented the accused under Section 22, CRPC, which took illegal action because the accused was not heard, who did not deliver the verdict in accordance with the provisions relating to the murder and the trial of Audi Ultram Part. Violation of the rules. The court had violated the provisions of section 444, the PPC conviction and the sentence awarded to the accused by the trial court were set aside and the trial was issued to the trial court so that section 2342, C.R. Under PC, the statements of the accused can be resumed from the recording phase. Rewrite the decision according to the law

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Village Sunder lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.