AMJAD ALI versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 491 Corps Applicant The applicant claimed that the detainee is 22 years old and that he himself is entitled to marry the applicant as his court and the marriage contract should be entered into Was executed with the consent of his mother. Discriminating respondents, who claimed that their father had left the minor children with him after their husband's death, challenged the validity of the marriage, alleging that The detention age is less than thirteen years and they have no jurisdiction to search the marriage contract nor to record the evidence, and it was the duty of the Family Court to decide whether the marriage contract was valid or not. The applicant had filed the petition with unclean hands; discretion cannot be exercised in favor of it.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Nooriabad lawyer