Find a Lawyer

MRS. MARIAM versus NAEEM AHMAD

According to the evidence, the tenant affidavit withheld by the Sindh Tenant Premises Ordinance 1979 section 15 was not given the opportunity to examine the evidence of the absence of a witness submitted by the landlord for the rent examination. An application for withdrawal was granted while it was dismissed by the High Court. In the evidence, the affidavit was not considered as evidence that in the absence of cross-examination, the tenant was not given the opportunity to cross-examine his case and the evidence of the landlord was gone illegally. The reason was the prejudice and injustice to the tenant which could lead to their request for leave. The appeal was reversed in the appeal, the rent controller as well as the high court's decisions were set aside and the case was remanded by the Supreme Court to the tenant controller for a decision on the landlord's cross-sectional attorney. After giving the opportunity to the decision. how to become a advocate from Sahiwal lawyer