Find a Lawyer

RASHEEDA BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL

All of the prosecution witnesses were interested in the testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 324/34 evidence. The incident took place in a densely populated area and many other independent private persons were present, but they were not examined in front of the house of a prosecution witness. The alleged incident happened. But his name did not appear in the FIR. Police arrived at the scene shortly after the incident, but no blood was found at the site of the crime. Didn't see the prosecution's witnesses. Before the FIR was filed, the inquiry was recognized as hostile between the parties and the witnesses were hostile to the accused party, lacking the independent sovereignty of such interested witnesses, adding that the witnesses were not even related to the place. Where the incident took place and severe controversy was found. No source of light was disclosed between the ocular and medical evidence. No weapons were used in the crime scene and criminal commission was recovered from any of the accused. He was acquitted of the charge, taking advantage of the doubt in these circumstances divorce advocates from Layyah lawyer