Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus STATE

Definitions of Sections 10 (2) and 16 Evidence Accused No evidence regarding the commission of adultery was presented by the prosecution in this case claiming that the two accused committed the adultery a day earlier. Have seen The incident was neither credible nor related to the allegations made by the prosecution witness, who stated that he saw the two accused riding the bus together because he did not encourage trust. Because he had neither talked to them nor seen any goods with them, nor had he. The testimony was not accepted on the record with the help of any other evidence, the documentary evidence on the record alleges by the complainant that the abduction of the woman was impossible because it was possible to be in her home at the relevant time. No, although the accused was acquitted. The woman accused did not file any appeal against her conviction and conviction, yet the verdict would be of benefit as well as the prosecution had failed to prove the charge of adultery against both the accused lady co-accused. It would also be considered that he was bad in this case. law firms from Parachinar lawyer