Find a Lawyer

MANSHA versus THE STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 302/34 Testimony of Evidence Eyewitnesses who were closely related to the deceased were witnesses of the occasion and their presence at 2:00 pm at night was not possible and natural. The house where the incident occurred was not witnessed as witness nor was presented to the trial court doctor at the time of the post-mortem, which did not provide any comment on the cause of the deceased's death. The 14-month post-mortem explanation was attributed to such a delay in the co-accused being acquitted on the same set of evidence, ocular testimony was not according to medical evidence, witnesses witnessed the incident. No, the question of the accused's false involvement in the matter cannot be ruled out. The suspects were acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances jobs for fresh advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer