Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AAMIR versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 392/492/34 & 412 Law In The Testimony (10 of 1984), Article 22 Evidentiary Complainant who was the only star witness, did not support the prosecution case. No accused was involved. The person who supervised the Identity Test Parade did not mention the identifying marks of the accused in the Memorial of Identity Parade and did not remember the characteristics of the three accused who were presented in the Identity Parade. It further stated that even the accused's wearing colors and clothes were not recalled and admitted that the dummy arrangements were made by his court staff magistrate, in the circumstances, careful identification and careful identification test. The parade was not performed as required by the rules. The toy pistol, allegedly used in the commission of the crime, could not have been helpful in the prosecution case and the sentence and sentence awarded to the accused by the trial court was set aside and dismissed by giving them the benefit of the doubt. had gone. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Narowal lawyer