MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus ABDUL RAHIM
Section 53 of the Property Act 1882 transfer of property into an unlawful or invalid transaction The proof of such transaction relied solely on the affirmation made by the plaintiff and did not present any evidence to prove the disputed transaction. But the case was heard by the Court of Appeal. The appeal and decision were justified even if the revenue record was included in the mutation, in the event of a dispute, the beneficiary under it did not relinquish its duty to prove the matter. The appellate court had largely misrepresented the evidence and acted on it. Depending on the changes themselves, when the law disappears, the trial court reverses the results recorded by the trial court where the findings of the trial court were based on proper reading of the evidence on record, the appellate court approved by the appellate court. The court's decision was overturned. And the trial court's situation was restored
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Shamsabad lawyer
