MESSRS S.M. AYUB & SONS versus ABDUL JABBAR QURESHI
The Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 section 16 (1) (2) prohibited the tenant's defense order by the tenant attacking the tenant's defense on the basis that the hiring controller attacked. The lender has temporarily failed to comply with the rental order. The order was ambiguous as a tenant before it was passed. The court had ruled that the court would not consider this report regarding the submission of rent to Nayar's court rent controller, neither the amount of arrears was mentioned in the temporary rent order nor that month. The tenant to whom the future rent was to be submitted, even if the defective rental order had a defect in collecting the rent, was only a technical default and the tenant's willful defense Could not be struck down on such a poor order. The Rental Controller Order was set aside and the matter was forwarded to the Rent Controller so that the same could be decided on the merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Haripur lawyer
