BASHIR AHMAD versus MST. NASEEM FATIMA
Cases 4, 15 and 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act of 1913 were dealt with by the brother before the case was filed by the plaintiff because the power of attorney was properly established by his lawyer. Had not been sued, which had led to the lawsuit being filed by the General Attorney. The plaintiff was executed when the land in the dispute was not normally purchased by the shopkeeper general attorney. Under the circumstances, the vendors had no option to file a lawsuit, the plaintiff's lawyer for filing a lawsuit Was not properly constituted, it was necessary for the plaintiff to appear in court in support of its claimant, failing which it could attract coercion against the supporters, especially when by the defendants. A special objection was raised that the plaintiff did not sign the plaintiff himself, which would allow him to appear in the witness box. I failed. Investigating the alleged facts in the Plaintiff, it was probable to discredit the fact of the case Plaintiff did not have, was established under appropriate authority, the search of the courts under this case was properly established. , They were wrong and not sustainable under the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Kallur Kot lawyer