Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, AGRICULTUREDEPARTMENT versus DR. SABIR ZAMEER SIDDIQUE


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) Terms and Conditions of Service Approved by the Supreme Court, the petition did not complain of the restoration of a government employee implementing a specific question relating to the law of public importance that the Supreme Court in the title of Dr. Sabir Zamir Was ordered. Siddiqui v. Mian Abdul Malik and 4 others reported that the PLD was not implemented by the service tribunal as 1991 SC 226. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the service tribunal's decision, following the rule set by the tribunal. Under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution, no specific question of the law of public importance was involved in this matter but the appeal was denied.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Tarmatan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.