Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR versus THE STATE

Definition of Evidence of Corruption Prevention Act, 1947 Section 5 (2) of the Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Section 161. The FIR mentioned two prosecution witnesses who demanded bribe money in their presence, one was dismissed by the prosecution and the other witness did not support the prosecution's case, and the third The prosecution's witness, on the contrary, supported the version of the accused that the complainant had returned Rs 3000 to the accused which the complainant had given to the complainant to buy a tape recorder for which the complainant had, for some reason, Could not have been bought by any of the prosecution witnesses, including the magistrate and the investigating officer, between the complainant and the accused Ali's conversation was not heard, in which case two versions are possible, the appropriate version of the accused was to be accepted the accused was acquitted. jobs for fresh advocates from Sialkot lawyer