Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

versus


The current results of the Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115, down to the dispute over the occupation of the shop by the courts, claim that he is the owner of the suit shop, but the documentary evidence available on the record was established by the defendant. I bought the house and not the suit. Both the courts reached the conclusion that the plaintiff was the legitimate owner of the shop in the dispute, so they have the right to seek the same justification filed by the trial court, and for valid reasons confirmed by the agreed facts. The amending jurisdiction shall not be interrupted The applicant failed to identify any unlawful interference or weakness in the decisions and the following orders passed by both the courts were just and correct and in the circumstances the application for review was dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Kandiaro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.