MUHAMMAD RASHID versus THE SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Article 1212 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 Appellant's validity has been rejected due to lack of required experience, the Appellant has to cancel the service tribunal. Instead of filing an appeal before the complainant, a constitutional petition was filed before the High Court and the case became enraged. Even the Supreme Court case is purely related to the terms and conditions of service, immediately before the Appellate Service Tribunal. Should seek all their legal remedies, but they filed their appeal after more than one year before the ineligible forums already served Prior to the Vinyl Effect Legacy, there was no justification for waiving the delay, the law would take its course and time and waiting for no one would defeat the delayed equity and the delay could not be stopped once it started. ? Prohibited, dismissed, in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Mehar lawyer
