NAZIR AHMED,P. AUDIT, LAHORE versus FAZAL HUSSAIN
Crimes (Special Courts) Ordinance 1984 Section 7 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Banks 200 and 203 in relation to banks were dismissed for technical reasons due to instability of fresh complaint, new complaint But in the present case, permission was sought from the court not only to withdraw the complaint but also to bring a new complaint and, more importantly, there was no restriction in the procedure for criminal proceedings. , 9 18 interest 18, In the interest of justice, when a previous complaint was allowed to be withdrawn to bring a new complaint on the same charges, such a route would be possible only with the necessary precautionary rule for discrimination. Where there were extraordinary circumstances. For the sake of entertaining another complaint on the same allegations, the erroneous, clear-cut abortion CE and new facts that the complainant had no knowledge of or could not advance to the appropriate prosecution's previous proceedings, when Even if a court is satisfied, an unusual situation can arise in one of these three categories. The dismissal was due to error or was the result of a miscarriage of justice, on the same allegation that it may oppose the second complaint that the complainant had a fault in failing to comply with the essential provisions of law which He appealed to the court. Allow it to withdraw the complaint, comply with the mandate, and then file a new complaint. A new complaint was filed by the complainant after seeking permission from the complainant and following the law. Evidence was not presented in the first complaint and neither of the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Topi lawyer