MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus SANA TEXTILE (PVT.) LIMITED
Sections, 30, 9, 309, Windinging and 4 414 The Company's outstanding debt claimant filed an application on the basis that the company failed to repay the loan, the company disputed the loan and denied the applicant's claim. Where the debt was simply not ready to be repaid, there was a lawsuit for recovery of minor remedies money The loan should be considered disputed The company was not disputed in the process of eliminating the loan amount and on that claim As the time limit was imposed, the High Court refused to terminate the company under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bhara Kahu lawyer
