Find a Lawyer

DHULAH KHAN versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (ii) / 337D Guarantee was not involved in any serious illness and cannot be extended on bail only because of it. The alleged crime against the accused, who was 65 years of age, came under the provisions of section 733 DD, PPC which was prohibited in section 7497 (1), the CCPC High Court could not make such a deep inquiry. Which was a trial. The court charged one hour of incompatibility between the medical evidence and the FIR version, and that the timing of the events was trivial and did not make the accused eligible for bail.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2001

• IRFAN HAMID v. AZIZ ALAIN 2001 MLD 988
• STATE v. GULZAR HUSSAIN 2001 PCRLJ 989
• RASHEEDA BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD AFZAL 2001 PCRLJ 994
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. ADMINISTRATOR/SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 2001 MLD 995
• KHAIR MUHAMMAD v. NAWAB BIBI 2001 CLC 1001
• PERVAIZ JAHANGIR v. DISTRICT RETURNING OFFRICER, KHANEWAL 2001 YLR 1001
• ALI MUHAMMAD v. PATHANI 2001 MLD 1003
• HUSSAIN MASIH v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUJRANWALA 2001 PCRLJ 1003

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2001 →

list of advocates from Thari Mirwah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes