AMIN versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 definition of the evidence was delayed by nine hours, but no explanation was offered by the complainant for the delay. The prosecution's witnesses were relatives of the complainant and were interested. There was no conviction of the perpetrators of such a heinous crime, especially when their interest and extraordinary evidence were not confirmed by any interesting circumstances. The ocular evidence contradicts the medical evidence, the matter allegedly captured at the scene of the crime was neither sent to the expert nor reported to any relevant prosecutor. The incident was anonymous and after discussions and consultation. The story was structured and alleged witnesses were suspected that the motive for the incident had not been positively verified by examining any evidence in the incident, which revealed the weapon was empty. Recovered and recovered vacancies were not rendered The accused was convicted and sentenced, failing to prove a case against any certified prosecution accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Umer Kot lawyer