Find a Lawyer

AES PAK GEN. (PVT.) COMPANY versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,LAHORE

The Lahore Development Authority (Defendant) has rescinded the rental order executed under Article 38 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 13 Criminal Procedure Code (V1898), Sections 403 and 561 of the Lahore Development Authority Act 1975. File not allowed. Without admitting such fact against the Magistrate under section 38 of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975, against the applicant company and also the section 38 of the said Act, the accused applicant (company) filed under section 249A, CRPC. Has accepted the request for. An order to review or discuss a crime and to be acquitted by a magistrate without recording all the evidence, therefore, although the offense was continued under section 38 of the Lahore Development Authority Act, 1975, it attracted Article 13 of the Constitution. was not. The prosecution or sentence was revoked or the offense was upheld A session court rejected the defendant's request for a review of the complaint filed by the accused company against the action taken by the magistrate. For which no exception could be taken. famous lower court advocate from Dinga lawyer