PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus ASHIQ HUSSAIN
Articles 42 and 54 of the Specific Relief Act 1877 and the trial order for the permanent injunction restraining the case to the extent of the ownership of the land, but the extent of the ownership of the trees on this land was excluded, but the judgment and injunction In filing an appeal against the trial court, the appellate court also claimed litigation regarding the ownership of the trees. The plaintiff did not disagree with the plaintiff's ownership of the land on which the property of the standing trees had grown, and said that the land would automatically be vested in the Court of Appeal. , In respect of the trees standing on the plaintiff's land, the trial court was justified in overturning the results
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Jalozai lawyer
