Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus THE STATE


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Maintaining a Complaint Request Exclusion from the Labor Court, jurisdiction over the final facts of the facts by the courts under the Petitioner. And as an Assistant Purchasing Manager. And he was responsible for procuring the requirements of the Hotel Labor Appellate Tribunal, as well as the High Court concluding that the applicant was not an employee and maintained his application under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, before the Labor Court. do not have. The appellate tribunal as well as the High Court found the evidence to be incorrect or unreadable and there was no jurisdiction in the decisions. The Supreme Court refused to interfere in the High Court's decision.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Sehwan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.