Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 465/468/471/34 Guarantee, Grant of the names of the accused was not included in the FIR except one of the date of the incident. Or the time was not mentioned. Direct evidence of kidnapping against the accused was not available in the FIR. No charges of recovery of the affected boys were found. The accused's statements are recorded under Section 161, CRPC, on which the prosecution relied. Was previously unacceptable. His arrest was not put on an identity test by the magistrate, nor were his judicial confessions recorded, the Investigation Officer made no sincere efforts in connection with the investigation of the case, and thus he did not know Tried to make the prosecution's case worse. The bail was admitted in the circumstances, but a punitive action was taken for the greater punishment, however, the action was directed against the Investigation Officer.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Dargai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.