MUSHTAQ AHMED versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 465/468/471/34 Guarantee, Grant of the names of the accused was not included in the FIR except one of the date of the incident. Or the time was not mentioned. Direct evidence of kidnapping against the accused was not available in the FIR. No charges of recovery of the affected boys were found. The accused's statements are recorded under Section 161, CRPC, on which the prosecution relied. Was previously unacceptable. His arrest was not put on an identity test by the magistrate, nor were his judicial confessions recorded, the Investigation Officer made no sincere efforts in connection with the investigation of the case, and thus he did not know Tried to make the prosecution's case worse. The bail was admitted in the circumstances, but a punitive action was taken for the greater punishment, however, the action was directed against the Investigation Officer.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Dargai lawyer