Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ISHTIAQUE versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 540 and 439 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (B) Revision of Prosecution Witnesses The prosecution's witnesses were cross-examined by a person who was neither an advocate on that day nor the date he submitted his jurisdiction, nor has he presented such a petition. Was able to do the cross-examination and said that the person did not properly perform the cross-examination which caused serious prejudice. The accused High Court, using its revised jurisdiction, appealed to the trial court to re-call or re-examine the prosecution's witnesses and provide the accused with a full opportunity of cross-examination.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Samundri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.