MUHAMMAD ISHTIAQUE versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 540 and 439 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (B) Revision of Prosecution Witnesses The prosecution's witnesses were cross-examined by a person who was neither an advocate on that day nor the date he submitted his jurisdiction, nor has he presented such a petition. Was able to do the cross-examination and said that the person did not properly perform the cross-examination which caused serious prejudice. The accused High Court, using its revised jurisdiction, appealed to the trial court to re-call or re-examine the prosecution's witnesses and provide the accused with a full opportunity of cross-examination.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Gujranwala lawyer
