SOHANRA versus MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Articles 9 and 10 of the West Pakistan Sustainability Holding Ordinance, Pakistan, 1973 (Article 1973), Article 199 Constitution proceedings The decision of the matter in the Peepersman scope was against the ratification scheme by the Board of Revenue, in the first period of litigation. The matter was finally decided by the High Court and the order was finalized by the Revenue Authority finalizing the scheme which had already been confirmed by the High Court, but the Board of Revenue Petitioners was upset and requested a review before the Board of Revenue. In the first petition filed by the High Court Ben was also rejected The decision of the parties was a personal one and the same was binding on the parties to the final victory, whose effect could not be alleviated by an order approved by the Board of Revenue Parties. The High Court and may not be allowed to reopen and re-run the matter again and again and the order passed by the Board of Revenue could not be sustained in law and was illegal and had no legal effect. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
