KALEEM ULLAH versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Suits Section 11, O 11, R 2, O VII, R 11 & O XXIII, R 1 (3) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Res Judiciary, Second Rule of Applicability, Civil Procedure Code of CPC Frame Order II proceedings were not withdrawn with permission to file the case for the same reason the trial court granted the defendant's request under OVII, R 11, CPC and in the subsequent case The District Judge was dismissed in the review jurisdiction. , R 11, The second trial of CPC accuracy was not sustained by AXXIII, R 1 (3), CPC because of the same action until the original case was returned with the permission of the defendant to file a fresh case. Are not taken The plaintiffs did not receive such consent, the decision of the reviewing court was not sustainable in the eyes of the law, which was passed in violation of the essential provisions of Sections 11, O 11, R 2 and O XXIII, R 1 (3). ), CP: c Plant Ridge was referenced in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer