Find a Lawyer

ISRAR-UL-HAQ versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Martial Law Regulation 1969 No. 58 Para 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Petition along with statement of the charges after dismissing the applicant of service He was fired after presenting the sheet. The Service Tribunal ordered the reinstatement of the applicant, W1, which did not apply to the military tribunal's action against the applicant, from the Service (Special Provisions) Regulation, 1969 [MLR 58]. The removal was not in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 3 (2). The applicant was not given the proper opportunity to meet the allegations leveled against him, no witness was allowed to take part in the operation in support of the defense of the applicant, the Tribunal already prepared by the Martial Law Authority A secret list was prepared which suggested punishment. Its presence was mentioned in a list given to the applicant as no deed could be linked to any consecration as it was not compliant with the De Mala Fed action law. The petitioner has to go to the service tribunal twice. And was able to get the final order for his reinstatement in service, but said that the order was not implemented. The pillar which posted the rules will not be attracted. The action against the applicant was completely dishonored. The constitutional petition filed by the applicant was affected by the bar provided by Article 1212 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973). Not done. advocate for immigration from Kahror Pacca lawyer