Find a Lawyer

FAYYAZ ALI versus SYED ISLAM AHMED KALIMI

Article Spec Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 8 Suit Public Document Certified Copy Admin's original record unable to locate the suit in which the suit property allocation order is in favor of the plaintiff, record certified Rebuilt with copies Documents The plaintiff examined the Assistant Director of the Authority as a court witness in evidence of its title in relation to the suit property, which said that the documents and the court said that, depending on the documents, the defendant decided that The courts mistakenly relied on the evidence. The witness of the Syed Court of the Assistant Director of Authority did not produce certified copies of any public document, but presented the record which was reconstructed, as the original record was not available and the plaintiff was a party to the case. Was searched. Be proved and defendant never established a case that the suit property was ever the same, or that the record was tampered with in favor of the defendant or that a fraud or fraud was committed. It was committed to influence any jurisdiction in his favor, the authority issued an order of allotment to the plaintiff and continued to accept the plaintiff as a legitimate allottee of the case. The property record was reconfigured and it was presented out of the custody of a person who needed to keep it. Some of the documents presented by the court witness were genuine, which could not be objected to. The court's testimony in support of the documentary evidence already presented by the plaintiff property advocates from Padidan lawyer