FEROZI versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
The Special Relief Act, 1877, had refused to implement the contract to sell the defense and recover the liability without considering the contract. The effect was that any compromise was invalid and the handwriting expert's opinion was negative to prove such a case. The matter was obtained in the view of the plaintiff and no evidence was brought on record to present the evidence, and the defendant also sued the revenue courts on the basis of wrongdoing and misrepresentation and misrepresentation to both the courts. His appearance before the search was denied. Evidence, judgment and orders of both the courts were reversed and the plaintiff's case dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Sahiwal lawyer