IJAZ AHMAD versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Prosecutor's prosecution's prosecution proved inconsistent against the accused and his family denied that the prosecutor's witness denied that the accused had cheated on their faces, while the complainant Specifically it is alleged that the suspects had clothes on their faces. The presence of a witness on this occasion was very doubtful and because of the material improvements made by him, he was not a reliable witness before the said witness was not above the board and was not considered a reliable witness to all ordinary people. Could go Spot, but none of them were investigated or presented by the prosecution, which was sufficient to conclude that no one could be traced to the incident, contradicting the statements of the witnesses, The crime committed with a person is the nature of arms and injuries. The darkness and identity of the accused was taken in which it was suspected that the prosecution was too high, it was difficult to believe that the victim's wife, who was also a witness at the time, had not received any association with an independent source. Either she was present or could identify the assailants based on her contradictory statements, the prosecutor's version is full of numerous doubts, the benefit of the doubt will reach the accused and the circumstances in which the accused's sentence has been canceled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Sheikhupura lawyer