ABDUL SHAKOOR versus FAZAL DIN
Section 424 and 164 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 454 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, amended the Revenue Record for the respondents who were listed as tenants in the register of the tenants in respect of the land in dispute. , They claim that they have some rights. The petitioner's request for correction of the registrant's sons and the registration of the registry was rejected by the district collector and the applicant's request was rejected by the Additional. The Commissioner shall not create any title in favor of the respondents / potential conversion of the sale on the basis that the entries in the revenue records cannot be changed for a long time as long as the contract between the parties or the order is not completed. No charge or right can be made in favor of the respondents. Since there was no right or title created in the suit for specific performance, the respondents could not, as a possible acquisition of the right, request the provisions of section 42 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, that they should be periodic I enroll in and register the Revenue Officers Change Registration that a right has been created for the respondents. Based on the agreement of sale, this cannot be allowed by admission to the Revenue Record Orders of the Authority below reviewed by the Board of Revenue.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Rawala Kot lawyer