Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

RAFI KASHIF versus IMTIAZ AHMAD


During the proceedings for the execution of Article 9, 10 and 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the Oaths Act 1873, the petitioner resigned from the offer for a disputed factual decision on special oath. What was decided against the dispute. The petitioner's position was that the court decided the matter without recording the parties' statements. The right to withdraw from the offer was not granted under Sections 9, 10 and 11 of the Act, 1873, and the applicant will not be allowed to return. From its presentation / position, on a mere technical basis, no material misconduct or illegal conduct was committed by the court below, the constitutional application was dismissed under the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Jhang lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.