BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE versus NAJMA KHURSHID
The procedure for executing CPC Orders and Orders Order XXI, R 32, Sections 99 and 115 was not properly complied with and an effective suit was filed for the mandatory injunction and both It was ordered by the courts below the request for execution. The objection filed by the judgment filed by the accused person was that since the mandatory order was not stated in the case compiled by the trial court, the order passed was only in respect of the declaration and not the mandatory order. In the matter of subjection, the words mandatory injunction, the decree could not be misunderstood. In this case, such an error was not fatal to the claim / the injunction petition was approved for both prayers, i.e. The objection presented earlier was the dismissal by both the courts below and O XXI, R 3 2 showcase notices were issued, CPC decision was issued under conditions ssed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
