Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD ALAM versus THE STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Section 392 definition of evidence was registered against FIR unidentified persons, the complainant did not identify the accused as the accused at the trial, only the piece of evidence presented by the prosecution against the accused After the co-disclosure was made, the police informed that the accused was his partner in the commission of the crime, saying that the disclosure could not constitute a basis for the accused's conviction. Because firstly, any information received while in custody from an accused cannot be proven at the trial unless a fact is discovered, and secondly, the disclosure There was no evidence that the accused was acquitted in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Pindi gheb lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.