STATE LIFE INSURANCE versus ZAHOOR AHMAD
Section 15 Removal of Tenants 'Exit Tenants' Home Use of the premises was leased in the name of the Director Effect Premises, which was leased to the Managing Director of the Limited Company and the house is owned by the same company. The owner was argued. It was held that the Managing Director had covered the company in the complex, even if the Director was in control of the case press, that such control was in the capacity of the Managing Director of the company and not in his personal capacity and that is The business was being managed. And the matter was also handled by the company in which the company was a separate legal entity of the company covered under the Act / Ordinance and could not prove to be the sole proprietorship of any landlord. The director / tenant dismissed the company's removal request from the rent controller because it was illegal, and it was set aside by the High Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kundina lawyer