Find a Lawyer

FIDA JAN versus THE STATE

Controlling Section 9 (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Drug Under Impact Act 1997, the recovery of 26kg of marijuana raids by the CIA authorities was the confession of the accused under the special control of the accused. Was not And CIA officials had no jurisdiction to raid his house for the purpose of drug addiction. During legal proceedings the recovery of marijuana was taken from the defendant's living room, during the trial the defendant failed to prove that the recovered articles were not in his exclusive possession, so merely to request that some Other people also occupied the house It was not enough to apologize for the allegations CIA officials did not prosecute the matter after the drug recovery was impacted by the trial court properly sentenced the accused And the High Court of Appeals denied the appeal law firms from Badin lawyer