Petitioners claim to be sued property mortgages affecting the detention of the suit subsidiary property owner's right to retain the Declaration of Section 42 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), section 28 [since declared exempt] It was only after the inception of the mortgage that it was disputed that the mortgagee did not redeem the suit for sixty years, the applicants had been the owner of the suit for more than sixty years, on the basis of negative possession, filed by the plaintiff. The suit was pronounced by the trial court, and the appellate court rejected the plaintiff on that basis. Section 28 of the Limitation Act 1908 was omitted so the suit for prescription did not proceed, so after the removal of Section 28 of the Limitation Act 1908, the present case could not proceed beyond the target date, ie 31 8 1991 (waiver). (Section 28, limitation act, 1908) and could have been buried at the very beginning, the appellate court correctly set aside the trial order. Court review request dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
