MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR
West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Sections 13 (3) (II) and 15 Furnace Ownership Requirement was rejected by the Bent Controller on the ground that the landlord had no other shop to occupy his personal use. Vacation and rented a cello. The appellate court set aside the rent control order stating that the landlord has an option to choose one of the rental shops for his business and recommends the tenant to the landlord's suitability. Had no right to The tenants of the various tenants against whom the eviction was sought could not plead that eviction should have been filed regarding any other property / home in which the property would be more suitable for the landlord's needs. The eviction request against the tenant and the rented out vacant shop, set up with no purpose as to why it did not occupy the landlord had, in the circumstances, caused personal dispute with regard to the shop. Could not make a case for need.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Feroz Watan lawyer